A teenage British girl has been convicted of falsely claiming she was raped after having sex with a 14-year-old boy in his bedroom.
The teenager claimed she was attacked when she was 15 after the boy “nagged” her to sleep with him during a game of “truth or dare”.
He was arrested by police and held overnight but denied rape and was freed without charge.
Instead police charged the girl, now 16, with making a false allegation to pervert the course of justice - despite both children being under the age of consent.
The girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, denied the charge, but has now been found guilty at Cheltenham Magistrates Court, where the judge branded her a “liar”, and remanded on unconditional bail for a pre-sentence report.
Technically, both youngsters were breaking the law by having intercourse under the age of 16 - where a child is 13 or older and consenting, the offence is classed as “unlawful sexual intercourse” - but the boy has not been prosecuted.
Rape campaigners on Tuesday criticised the decision to charge the girl.
Lisa Longstaff, from Women Against Rape, said: “It’s awful that a girl so young has been prosecuted in this way.”
The case recalls controversial comments four years ago by then Dyfed-Powys chief constable Terry Grange, who said it would not be possible to prosecute all young boys who have sex with young girls.
He said in 2006: “If you prosecute each and every time a boy has sex with a girl under 16 and above 12, then we’d be in the schools across Britain and in the youth clubs across Britain pretty regularly because, since I’ve been alive, it’s been pretty normal. It’s what teenagers do.”
The girl, from Gloucestershire, claimed that after a game of “truth or dare”, which at one point involved her and a female friend lifting their tops, the boy had “nagged” her to have sex with him but she had repeatedly said she didn’t want to.
Then when he asked her three or four times to lie down on the bed, she did so just to shut him up.
She claimed the boy covered them both with duvets, took off some of her clothes, and raped her. She said she “froze” during the incident and though she told him quietly to stop, she did not call out to her friends for help. But the prosecution said the girl’s account of the alleged rape was “riddled with lies”.
Julian Kesner, prosecuting, said she had at first said just the two of them were in the bedroom but later admitted that two friends were also there.
He added that the day after the alleged attack the girl was spotted holding hands with the boy. Kesner said: “When she told her friend she had accused the boy of rape, the other girl, who had been in the room at the time, said: ‘Oh my God, it wasn’t rape. What have you got yourself into now?’ ”
On the third and final day of the trial, the girl admitted that she had told lies to police but continued to maintain that she had been raped.
District Judge Joti Bopa Rai concluded that the sex was consensual, saying it was possible the girl had lied because she feared she was pregnant or to “cover her tracks”.
“That lie grew bigger and bigger and bigger,” she added.
She said she appreciated the defendant was young but said: “She knew the consequences of telling lies and getting the boy concerned into trouble. The consequences for him have been horrendous and I believe she meant that to happen.” - Daily Mail